|
Post by Dogme Eliphas on Jan 18, 2010 21:58:16 GMT
Not sure how combining would work, you're both in both, so may have a better idea - would it help either group, or confuse?
|
|
|
Post by Bonus Eliphas on Jan 18, 2010 21:59:01 GMT
I'm still here, but I'm short of suggestions for this.
|
|
|
Post by Miranda Linden on Jan 18, 2010 22:01:38 GMT
To clarify, I wonder if some of the people we know might be more interested in getting involved in geodecity if they felt they could have some kind of input, it might seem a bit like a fixed thing now, although I know that's not what you intend
|
|
|
Post by Dogme Eliphas on Jan 18, 2010 22:02:16 GMT
I probably need to go.
Do people agree with the idea of just scheduling meetings at a regular time/date. Wednesday 20:30 and alternate between forum and SL. To avoid wasting time discussing dates and times?
|
|
|
Post by winston on Jan 18, 2010 22:02:10 GMT
I'm not sure that combining is the way to go, because the family definitely mutated into something different.
Rather, there may be some aborted pathways that might translate ok into Geodecity. Stuff like the vision quest or the meditation workshop
It may be a way of persuading some of the family participants to become Geodecians
|
|
|
Post by winston on Jan 18, 2010 22:03:40 GMT
I probably need to go. Do people agree with the idea of just scheduling meetings at a regular time/date. Wednesday 20:30 and alternate between forum and SL. To avoid wasting time discussing dates and times? yep
|
|
|
Post by Miranda Linden on Jan 18, 2010 22:03:52 GMT
Not sure how combining would work, you're both in both, so may have a better idea - would it help either group, or confuse? Well, The Family isn't a group, it was a mask, an idea we wore for a while on the path elsewhere. I didn't make it very clear, I just meant that there might be some ideas from that project that other people we know might be interested in bringing into geodecity if it's appropriate
|
|
|
Post by Dogme Eliphas on Jan 18, 2010 22:03:59 GMT
To clarify, I wonder if some of the people we know might be more interested in getting involved in geodecity if they felt they could have some kind of input, it might seem a bit like a fixed thing now, although I know that's not what you intend I definitely still see it as open, just confused. So if people might want to join I think we should discuss making this more clear and open. As Bonus indicated earlier, it certainly seems like the project needs more people that want to input.
|
|
|
Post by Bonus Eliphas on Jan 18, 2010 22:04:08 GMT
Do people agree with the idea of just scheduling meetings at a regular time/date. Wednesday 20:30 and alternate between forum and SL. To avoid wasting time discussing dates and times? I'm fine with this.
|
|
|
Post by Bonus Eliphas on Jan 18, 2010 22:05:09 GMT
I've got to go now. See you in SL.
|
|
|
Post by Miranda Linden on Jan 18, 2010 22:05:15 GMT
I probably need to go. Do people agree with the idea of just scheduling meetings at a regular time/date. Wednesday 20:30 and alternate between forum and SL. To avoid wasting time discussing dates and times? I'm fine with that, I might not make it every week, but it seems a good start
|
|
|
Post by Dogme Eliphas on Jan 18, 2010 22:06:31 GMT
OK see you in SL next week, and maybe we can pick these points (that we have started tonight) again, with having thought about them some more.
|
|
|
Post by Miranda Linden on Jan 18, 2010 22:07:10 GMT
So if people might want to join I think we should discuss making this more clear and open. yes please, clear and open, that's exactly what I want, clear and open
|
|